• 月薪3000男会计豪掷930万打赏 女主播该退钱吗? 2019-07-10
  • 习近平:在深入推动长江经济带发展座谈会上的讲话 2019-07-10
  • 西部网(陕西新闻网)www.cnwest.com 2019-07-02
  • 树牢“四个意识” 扎实推进人大工作 2019-07-02
  • [雷人]不管什么税,只有还能通过二次交易获利,就有炒作的空间,房价一样是不会恢复合理的! 2019-06-22
  • 联播快讯:美联储今年第二次加息 2019-06-19
  • 因为中国人最朴素的观念就是安居乐业。家,是人立身之地,是所有努力可以得到支撑的基础,是所有固守能够成功反击的前提。这是游牧民族永远干不动搞不定这个民族的原因。它 2019-06-19
  • 宝宝鼻子不通气怎么办 通气好方法都在这! 2019-06-17
  • 世界杯来了 电影大片也来了 2019-05-28
  • 紫光阁中共中央国家机关工作委员会 2019-05-26
  • 确认过眼神 这只“美瞳大眼睛”是国家二级保护动物褐林鸮 2019-05-24
  • 回复@大雨582:你看咱帖子所涉及的知识面、逻辑、心态等,不是自由而全面发展的人可能有的么? 2019-05-24
  • 用当代中国马克思主义指导改革发展实践 2019-05-16
  • 梦幻!英国减压健身新趋势 当一条美人鱼 2019-05-09
  • 新生入学网上怎么报名 合肥教育局解答常见问题 2019-05-08
  • c罗意甲表现:David Schoen: Democrats' demands that Mueller testify are all wrong – They know he can’t discuss his report

    Demands by Democrats that Special Counsel Robert Mueller testify before Congress about his report on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election show a complete lack of respect for the rule of law and the constitutional provisions of the separation of powers.

    With their single-minded objective of attacking President Trump, congressional Democrats are sending a dangerous message to the American people.

    It is wrong for Democrats to demand that Mueller testify and it would be wrong for Mueller to do so.

    A. SCOTT BOLDEN: THE CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT AGAINST TRUMP AND BARR

    When Mueller accepted his appointment as special counsel, he did so fully aware of the federal regulations governing his office. The regulations make it absolutely clear that the special counsel is prohibited from discussing his report publicly.

    Leading members of Congress now demanding that Mueller testify know he is barred from doing so. The current special counsel regulations were passed while they were members of Congress.

    In 1978, Congress passed the Ethics in Government Act. It created a process for appointing special prosecutors.  This is a different position from special counsels like Mueller.

    The current regulations expressly provide that it is for the attorney general alone to determine what, if any, information to release publicly.

    Under the 1978 law, Congress could mandate the appointment of a special prosecutor. Congress could remove the special prosecutor, and the special prosecutor was required to report to Congress. The executive and legislative branches were both a direct part of the process. However, the law on special prosecutors expired and it was not renewed.

    In 1999, the special counsel regulations under which Mueller was appointed became law and remain in effect today. These regulations were written and heavily promoted by President Bill Clinton’s administration. They changed the 1978 law in several important ways.

    Under the current regulations, the special counsel does not report to Congress. Congress cannot require the appointment or removal of a special counsel. These powers and duties lie exclusively with the attorney general.

    Section 600.9 of the special counsel regulations backed by the Clinton administration places very limited requirements on the attorney general in regard to what he needs to provide to Congress, and he has already exceeded these requirements.

    The current regulations expressly provide that it is for the attorney general alone to determine what, if any, information to release publicly. The special counsel and his staff are expressly constrained from public comment on their report, as with any criminal investigation.

    These regulations are the law. There is no exception in the law for the special counsel to comment to further the political agenda of a member of Congress.

    Each of us might love the opportunity to question Mueller about his report – but our interest in doing so, even if genuinely motivated, does not supersede the law. This process was never intended to be a free-for-all.

    Consider the specter of Mueller being asked questions on subjects that the attorney general – based on the authority Congress gave exclusively to him – has concluded should not be publicly disclosed because of legitimate concerns specified under the regulations.

    Or what if Mueller has been shaken by the criticism his report has garnered among many Democrats and he seeks to redeem himself or the members of his team who have longstanding Democratic ties?

    In that case, Mueller would have a conflict between his own perceived self-interest and the legitimate privacy concerns of the regulations under which he operated.

    The fact is that Mueller’s report speaks for Mueller and his team after costing us millions of dollars and after an investigation lasting almost two years.

    The special counsel process, ill-conceived from the start, is over and Congress has the Mueller report to pore over. Mueller and his views regarding the subject of his investigation are both factually and legally irrelevant now.

    It is a disgrace that any member of Congress would choose to ignore the law, mislead the public, and put Mueller in a position of being required to testify. The onus should not be placed on either the president or the attorney general in this matter. They need only point to the law. Mueller must insist that Congress follow the law as well.

    The larger question here is: What on Earth has happened to the Democratic Party? It was once home to true American heroes and some of the most significant substantive public policies our country ever has known.

    I was extraordinarily proud to be a trial lawyer for the Democratic Party in a case several years ago, but that party no longer exists. Its agenda now is limited to attacking President Trump, rather than working constructively to make the country and the world a better and safer place.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP      

    Democratic leadership has been paralyzed by the party’s so-called progressive wing, empowering the unabashed anti-Semitism espoused regularly, unmistakably and unapologetically by some of its prominent freshmen members.

    Yesterday’s Democratic Party, maligned by these freshmen, had much to offer on the important issues of the day. But if it remains on its current track, the Democratic Party will be little more than an ancient relic, representing narrow interests and a philosophy that cuts against our most treasured, inclusive American values and beliefs.

    CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY DAVID SCHOEN

  • 月薪3000男会计豪掷930万打赏 女主播该退钱吗? 2019-07-10
  • 习近平:在深入推动长江经济带发展座谈会上的讲话 2019-07-10
  • 西部网(陕西新闻网)www.cnwest.com 2019-07-02
  • 树牢“四个意识” 扎实推进人大工作 2019-07-02
  • [雷人]不管什么税,只有还能通过二次交易获利,就有炒作的空间,房价一样是不会恢复合理的! 2019-06-22
  • 联播快讯:美联储今年第二次加息 2019-06-19
  • 因为中国人最朴素的观念就是安居乐业。家,是人立身之地,是所有努力可以得到支撑的基础,是所有固守能够成功反击的前提。这是游牧民族永远干不动搞不定这个民族的原因。它 2019-06-19
  • 宝宝鼻子不通气怎么办 通气好方法都在这! 2019-06-17
  • 世界杯来了 电影大片也来了 2019-05-28
  • 紫光阁中共中央国家机关工作委员会 2019-05-26
  • 确认过眼神 这只“美瞳大眼睛”是国家二级保护动物褐林鸮 2019-05-24
  • 回复@大雨582:你看咱帖子所涉及的知识面、逻辑、心态等,不是自由而全面发展的人可能有的么? 2019-05-24
  • 用当代中国马克思主义指导改革发展实践 2019-05-16
  • 梦幻!英国减压健身新趋势 当一条美人鱼 2019-05-09
  • 新生入学网上怎么报名 合肥教育局解答常见问题 2019-05-08
  • 波西亚时光家园设计 网上买彩票 时时彩软件 北京赛车官网开奖记录 法兰克福足球今天比赛 宁夏11选5前一遗漏 安徽时时彩一天几期 尤文图斯马德里竞技回放 皇马毕尔巴鄂竞技直播 四大神兽援彩金 深圳福坛平特一肖 天津十一选五怎么样 天天酷跑暮光女神宝物 澳超悉尼fc 莱万特vs巴列卡诺 招财童子游戏